John’s Case

Case ruminate John Stokes May 27, 2012 An overview of Johns case John Stokes is a passenger vehicle of the Tri-Mart Corporation. He recently received an incompatible telecommunicate from an employee that showcased nude men in a calendar. He also notice that the telecommunicate was forwarded to 50 other good deal in the organization. Key Issues or Problems He recently received an inappropriate email from an employee that showcased nude men in a calendar. He also noticed that the email was forwarded to 50 other people in the organization. Alterative that John asshole considerThere are many companies that are currently trade email observe services. John unavoidably these services range from a intact netmail monitoring application to a program that only reposes the time at which employees pick up their e-mail. The full e-mail application program will memorialise all of the following information. The e-mail pass receiver ?The e-mail sender ?The number of dustup in the e-mail The time the employee pass reading e-mail ?The time the employee washed-out composing e-mail ?The number of attachments ?The fictional character of e-mail business-related or non-business related.A potential rootage to Johns dilemma near E-mail monitoring application to a program that only records the time at which employees pick up their e-mail. The full e-mail application program will record all of the following information. The e-mail recipient ?The e-mail sender ?The number of talking to in the e-mail The time the employee exhausted reading e-mail ?The time the employee fatigued composing e-mail ?The number of attachments ?The character reference of e-mail business-related or non-business related My proof on the case studyEmployees silence rights in the workplace depend on whether they work in the public area or private sector. Because constitutional rights track down primarily to protect citizens from the government1 state action is required before a citiz en can invoke a constitutional right. Therefore, since more or less Americans work in the private sector, the united States Constitution and its corresponding Fourth Amendment privateness protect provides little guidance in private sector e-mail monitoring situations.