Jesus, Paul, And Mohammed: Com :: essays research papers

Michael hart is an unskilled historian and also the author of The ampere-second A Ranking of the near(prenominal) Influential Persons in History. In this book stag lists in order of magnitude the people he supposes to be the transcend 100 most potent people. In this essay I am passage to look at leash specific people, and comp are Hart&8217s localize of their force on society against my own. The three people are delivery boy of Nazareth, the give out of Christianity Paul of Tarsus, Christianity&8217s most meaning(a) missional and Muhammad, the founder of Islam. Since godliness did play a considerable role in the shaping of civilizations, it is no coincidence that these three people are singly the three most important people in the founding of the top cardinal religions in the human. Also Hart&8217s rank of these three men go forth be analyzed, and compared to my own rankings of these three influential men.In Hart&8217s book, The 100, he regards all three of the se men as being actually important in contributing to the rise of two great religions. In his ranking of the top 100 Muhammad, Jesus, and St. Paul rank one, three, and six respectively. direct right from this dictation most people would believe that Hart is already wrong, and that Jesus should be one. In some spirit those who believe that Jesus are right because the amount of Christians in the world almost double that of the Moslems. Yet if we carefully look at Hart&8217s reasons for ranking them the way he does, you would see that his ranking seems more understandable. First we should take time off by analyzing Hart&8217s reasons for ranking Muhammad one. His principal(prenominal) point for ranking him one, above Jesus, is because &8220 Muhammad played a more important role in the information of Islam then Jesus did on the development of Christianity(9). He believes this statement to be true because St. Paul complemented Jesus in helping to spreading the belief of Christia nity. Though Jesus was prudent for the chief(prenominal) ethical and clean-living precepts it was St. Paul who was the main developer of its theology, its proselytizer, and for writing a prominent portion of the newfangled Testament. While on the other hand Muhammad was the except one responsible for the teachings of Islam, and also to the moral and main ethical principles. This is shown in the idea that the Koran, the saintly book of Islam, contains the teachings of Muhammad, and that his teachings are said to be the linguistic process of God.Jesus, Paul, And Mohammed Com essays research text file Michael Hart is an amateur historian and also the author of The 100 A Ranking of the Most Influential Persons in History. In this book Hart lists in order the people he believes to be the top 100 most influential people. In this essay I am going to look at three specific people, and compare Hart&8217s ranking of their impact on society against my own. The three people are Jesu s of Nazareth, the founder of Christianity Paul of Tarsus, Christianity&8217s most important missionary and Muhammad, the founder of Islam. Since religion did play a considerable role in the shaping of civilizations, it is no coincidence that these three people are respectively the three most important people in the founding of the top two religions in the world. Also Hart&8217s ranking of these three men will be analyzed, and compared to my own rankings of these three influential men.In Hart&8217s book, The 100, he regards all three of these men as being very important in contributing to the rise of two great religions. In his ranking of the top 100 Muhammad, Jesus, and St. Paul rank one, three, and six respectively. Now right from this statement most people would believe that Hart is already wrong, and that Jesus should be one. In some sense those who believe that Jesus are right because the amount of Christians in the world almost doubles that of the Moslems. Yet if we carefully look at Hart&8217s reasons for ranking them the way he does, you would see that his ranking seems more understandable. First we should start by analyzing Hart&8217s reasons for ranking Muhammad one. His main point for ranking him one, above Jesus, is because &8220 Muhammad played a more important role in the development of Islam then Jesus did on the development of Christianity(9). He believes this statement to be true because St. Paul complemented Jesus in helping to spread the belief of Christianity. Though Jesus was responsible for the main ethical and moral precepts it was St. Paul who was the main developer of its theology, its proselytizer, and for writing a large portion of the New Testament. While on the other hand Muhammad was the only one responsible for the teachings of Islam, and also to the moral and main ethical principles. This is shown in the idea that the Koran, the sacred book of Islam, contains the teachings of Muhammad, and that his teachings are said to be the w ords of God.