Science vs Religion Essays -- Human Evolution vs Relgion

Science is not only compatible with spirituality it is a primal source of spirituality. When we recognize our place in an immensity of light historic period and in the passage of ages, when we grasp the intricacy, beauty, and subtlety of life, then that soaring feeling, that adept of elation and humility combined, is surely spiritual. The notion that apprehension and spirituality are somehow mutually exclusive does a disservice to both. -- Carl SaganStudents bring with them legion(predicate) assumptions about science, about religious belief, and about their kindred. These assumptions may impact, positively or negatively, their willingness and mogul to engage the scientific study of charitable origins. This essay is provided as a guide to begin thinking about science and religion in the context of the possible interactions of ghostlike worldviews with a scientific account of piece evolution and origins. In other words, this essay will explain how gracious evolution and r eligion can peacefully coexist.What is science?Science is a way to understand genius by developing explanations for the structures, processes and history of personality that can be tested by observations in laboratories or in the field. Sometimes such observations are direct, like measuring the chemical piece of a rock. Other times these observations are indirect, like determining the straw man of an exoplanet through the wobble of its host star. An explanation of some aspect of nature that has been well supported by such observations is a theory. Well-substantiated theories are the foundations of human understanding of nature. The pursuit of such understanding is science.What is religion?Religion, or much appropriately religions, are cultural phenomena comprised of social institutions, traditions of practice, literatures, sacred texts and stories, and sacred places that put and convey an understanding of ultimate meaning. Religions are very diverse. While it is leafy v egetable for religions to identify the ultimate with a deity (like the western monotheisms Judaism, Christianity, Islam) or deities, not all do. There are non-theistic religions, like Buddhism.What is the difference in the midst of science and religion?Although science does not provide proofs, it does provide explanations. Science depends on deliberate, explicit and formal testing (in the natural world) of explanations for the wa... ...e is practiced without reference to religion. graven image may be an ultimate explanation, but God is not a scientific explanation. This approach to science is called methodological naturalism. However, this method of isolating unearthly interests from scientific research is not an example of the separation approach. Historically, this bracketing out of religious questions in the practice of scientific inquiry was promoted by religious thinkers in the 18th and 19th centuries as the most fruitful way to fancy penultimate rather than ultimate explanations of the structures and processes of nature.A third possibility for the relationship between science and religion, one of interaction, at minimum holds that dialogue between science and religion can be valuable, more that science and religion can constructively benefit from engagement, and at maximum envisions a overlap of scientific and religious perspectives. Generally, this view encourages an effort to explore the significance of scientific understanding for religious understanding and vice versa. With this approach science mud relevant beyond the classroom for many people who might other than ignore scientific findings.